Decisions
Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal decisions can be searched on the Federal Court website by selecting 'Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal' under 'Court'.
2023 |
2022 |
2021
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
2015 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
2008 |
2007 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001
2000
1999 |
1994 |
1992 |
1991 |
1990 |
1989 |
1987 |
1986
| prior to 1985
-
Williams v Chief of Army [2016] ADFDAT 3
DEFENCE - appellant convicted of one charge before Defence Force Magistrate, acquitted of two other charges - whether DFM had jurisdiction to hear and determine the charges - consideration of "service connection" and "service status" tests of jurisdiction - DFM had jurisdiction - whether DFM erred in consideration of any inconsistencies in…
-
Angre v Chief of Navy (No 2) [2016] ADFDAT 2
DEFENCE - application for leave to amend grounds of appeal - application for leave to adduce and rely on additional documentary evidence - whether s 23(1) of the Defence Force Discipline Appeals Act 1955 (Cth) confers incidental powers on the Tribunal to receive fresh or new evidence on appeal - whether s 23(2) of the Defence Force Discipline Act…
-
Angre v Chief of Navy (No 1) [2016] ADFDAT 1
DEFENCE - application for leave to appeal out of time against convictions entered by a General Court Martial - where application under s 134(1) of the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) and r 38 of the Court Martial and Defence Force Magistrate Rules to substitute a plea of not guilty dismissed - whether appellant precluded from bringing…
-
Hodge v Chief of Navy [2015] ADFDAT 4
DEFENCE FORCE - discipline - appeals against conviction - conviction arising out of receipt of rental allowance - obtaining financial advantage by deception - whether Defence Force Magistrate failed to consider appellant's intention in concluding that selection of "not sharing" option in online application for rental allowance was "false and hence …
-
Jesser v Chief of Air Force [2015] ADFDAT 3
DEFENCE - conviction relating to threat to inflict grievous bodily harm under s 31 of the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) (the Act) - whether open to conclude beyond reasonable doubt that appellant guilty of charge on which she was convicted - where threat spoken by appellant to her treating doctor during medical consultation and in respect of appellant's…
-
Jordan v Chief of Air Force [2015] ADFDAT 2
DEFENCE - conviction relating to receipt of rental allowance - whether appellant guilty of the charge on which he was convicted - consideration of proper construction of the offence of "obtaining a financial advantage" under s 135.2(1) of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) - whether physical and fault elements must exist contemporaneously - whether…
-
Thompson v Chief of Navy [2015] ADFDAT 1
DEFENCE - whether convictions recorded following pleas of guilty should be quashed - whether plea bargain based on incorrect construction of the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) resulted in miscarriage of justice
-
McLaren v Chief of Navy [2013] ADFDAT 5
DEFENCE FORCE - appeal from Restricted Court Martial against convictions for committing an act of indecency - circumstantial evidence - whether Judge Advocate erred in failing to give proper direction - admissibility of evidence based on inference drawn by witness from observed facts - whether substantial miscarriage of justice - meaning of…
-
Leith v Chief of Army [2013] ADFDAT 4
DEFENCE - convictions relating to theft of ammunitions and disobedience of lawful command - whether Judge Advocate erred in admitting evidence - consideration of "special circumstances" under s 101JA(3) of the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 ("the DFDA") - balancing the interests of justice - double jeopardy - whether the Judge Advocate erred in …
-
King v Chief of Navy [2013] ADFDAT 3
DEFENCE - Convictions relating to receipt of rental and other allowances - whether Judge Advocate erred in direction to panel about whether appellant and his wife "normally lived together" for purposes of relevant Defence Determination - whether verdicts entered against appellant inconsistent with other verdicts of acquittal - whether Judge…